Communication, judgement and behaviour can affect what teams deliver, whether people stay and how a company grows. Explore the evidence behind those business questions.
These studies explain why behaviour and working relationships deserve serious attention. They do not test Élan or establish MindFrame’s predictive accuracy.
22 sources · All research
Randomised field experiment · Journal of Political Economy
Soft skills can change measurable output.
Workplace soft-skills training increased productivity by 13.5%. Gains were stronger on collaborative work and also reached untrained colleagues on treated production lines.
335 independent samples and 26,573 participants; the results-outcome analysis used 78 samples.
Study scope: Mixed study designs and outcomes; this does not establish a universal revenue increase or the effectiveness of candidate assessment.
For your next decision
Can this leader improve how others decide, learn and deliver?
Randomised laboratory experiment · Econometrica
Some people make the whole team better.
Some people consistently helped their teams exceed the performance predicted from members’ individual task skills. Social skills helped explain this contribution.
255 participants repeatedly assigned to three-person teams.
Study scope: Short laboratory tasks; the team-player effect was not predicted by personality in this sample. The finding supports observing teamwork, not relying on personality labels alone.
For your next decision
Are we assessing personal performance—or their effect on everyone else too?
Field experiment · Inter-American Development Bank working paper
Training can show up in sales.
Stores in that group recorded 12.1% higher daily sales relative to controls.
138 Chilean retail stores; managers and sales associates trained together in one treatment group.
Study scope: One retailer and a mixed training package that included sales and product content. The full gain cannot be attributed to soft skills alone.
For your next decision
How does this manager help the team turn knowledge into customer results?
Proprietary observational meta-analysis · Gallup
Engagement is linked to business results.
Top-quartile engagement units had median differences of 23% higher profitability and 18% higher sales productivity versus bottom-quartile units. Turnover was also lower.
136 independent samples, more than 22,000 individuals and nearly 5,000 groups.
Study scope: Mostly correlational evidence; psychological safety is a shared working condition, not a fixed personality score or a guarantee of performance.
For your next decision
Can people admit a mistake, ask for help and challenge an idea around them?
Longitudinal meta-analysis · Journal of Business Ethics
The damage can show up in silence.
Destructive leadership was associated with later silence, lower satisfaction and commitment, and stronger intentions to leave.
104 longitudinal studies and 30,314 participants; first published online in 2023.
Study scope: Direction of causality remains complex: reciprocal analyses controlling prior behaviour did not establish a significant leader-to-negative-behaviour effect.
For your next decision
What happens after someone disagrees with them or brings bad news?
Executive survey and interviews · Journal of Financial Economics
Leaders value culture. Attention does not always follow.
92% believed improving culture would increase company value. Among the 1,130 answering the leadership-time question, 69% said leaders needed to invest more time in culture.
Study scope: Executives’ reported beliefs, not a measured financial return or a comparison of spending priorities.
For your next decision
Will this hire strengthen the behaviour your company values—or undermine it?
Longitudinal observational study · Industrial and Corporate Change
How a company manages people matters as it grows.
Changes in how firms selected, motivated and managed people were associated with higher failure risk. Replacing a founder with an outside CEO alone did not show the same pattern.
Young Silicon Valley technology firms; failure analysis covered 154 firms and 28 failures, followed to June 2001.
Study scope: Historical organisational-change evidence, not a test of candidate soft skills. It does not establish that one hire causes business failure or that culture should never change.
For your next decision
Can the company grow while keeping trust, expectations and responsibilities clear?
In one large service business, the estimated difference between top- and bottom-decile supervisors exceeded the output of an additional worker on a nine-person team.
58,542 workers across 11 firms, largely service/BPO settings. Misconduct means termination for egregious policy violations. The cost model included additional colleague turnover.
Study scope: A working paper and context-specific comparison. This does not classify difficult, unfamiliar or disagreeing people as harmful or establish that Élan can predict misconduct.
Event study · Journal of Financial Economics
Judgement can become reputation.
Public executive indiscretions were associated with weaker operating performance. Events involving CEOs were also associated with fewer new major customers and joint-venture partnerships.
Public executive allegations and indiscretions; 219 distinct events plus 106 related observations.
Study scope: Public events and associations, not the average cost of a bad hire or justification for private-life profiling. Personality assessment is not shown to predict these events.
US financial advisers; brokerage mergers used to examine exposure to new colleagues.
Study scope: A specialised financial-sector setting and identification strategy, not a numerical contagion rate for all teams or a personality-based forecast.
24 neonatal intensive-care teams in a simulation, with blinded performance ratings.
Study scope: Simulated medical tasks, not evidence of startup revenue losses or patient mortality, nor proof an assessment can identify a future harmful colleague.
885 institutional venture capitalists at 681 firms; firm-level aggregation.
Study scope: Reported investor priorities, not measured causes of portfolio failure or evidence that 95% of investment outcomes depend on team quality.
Study scope: An association in a specific model and sample, not a universal failure percentage, a founder diagnosis or an argument for similar personalities.
Eisenmann's Dot & Bo case connects repeated operations-leadership hiring problems with operational disorder and cash consumption, alongside financing conditions.
Dot & Bo case; multiple interacting operational and financing causes. Not a representative statistical estimate.
Study scope: The case contains interacting operational and financing causes; it does not establish losses attributable to one appointment or prevention through assessment.
Meta-analytic reassessment · Journal of Applied Psychology
Better interviews need structure
Structured interviews ranked highest among the selection procedures studied. Earlier estimates were often overstated.
172 studies and 836 effect sizes across distinct kinds of fit and work outcomes.
Study scope: Association and context, not a formula proving a particular candidate will succeed.
Meta-analytic review · Personnel Psychology
Looking like a leader is different from leading well
Narcissism was positively associated with leadership emergence, with no overall linear relationship with effectiveness. Self versus other ratings differed.