Skip to content

    Evidence / The business case

    People skills. Business results.

    Communication, judgement and behaviour can affect what teams deliver, whether people stay and how a company grows. Explore the evidence behind those business questions.

    These studies explain why behaviour and working relationships deserve serious attention. They do not test Élan or establish MindFrame’s predictive accuracy.

    22 sources · All research

    Randomised field experiment · Journal of Political Economy

    Soft skills can change measurable output.

    Workplace soft-skills training increased productivity by 13.5%. Gains were stronger on collaborative work and also reached untrained colleagues on treated production lines.

    Adhvaryu, Kala & Nyshadham · Returns to On-the-Job Soft Skills Training · 2023 ↗

    2,703 female garment workers across five Indian factories.

    Study scope: One firm and industry; a training intervention, not a hiring-assessment result or a universal productivity gain.

    For your next decision

    Will this person make the people around them more effective?

    Meta-analysis · Journal of Applied Psychology

    Leadership skills can improve how the work gets done.

    Leadership training showed positive average effects on behaviour at work and results for employees and organisations.

    Lacerenza et al. · Leadership Training Design, Delivery, and Implementation: A Meta-Analysis · 2017 ↗

    335 independent samples and 26,573 participants; the results-outcome analysis used 78 samples.

    Study scope: Mixed study designs and outcomes; this does not establish a universal revenue increase or the effectiveness of candidate assessment.

    For your next decision

    Can this leader improve how others decide, learn and deliver?

    Randomised laboratory experiment · Econometrica

    Some people make the whole team better.

    Some people consistently helped their teams exceed the performance predicted from members’ individual task skills. Social skills helped explain this contribution.

    Weidmann & Deming · Team Players: How Social Skills Improve Team Performance · 2021 ↗

    255 participants repeatedly assigned to three-person teams.

    Study scope: Short laboratory tasks; the team-player effect was not predicted by personality in this sample. The finding supports observing teamwork, not relying on personality labels alone.

    For your next decision

    Are we assessing personal performance—or their effect on everyone else too?

    Field experiment · Inter-American Development Bank working paper

    Training can show up in sales.

    Stores in that group recorded 12.1% higher daily sales relative to controls.

    Prada, Rucci & Urzúa · Training, Soft Skills and Productivity: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Retail · 2019 ↗

    138 Chilean retail stores; managers and sales associates trained together in one treatment group.

    Study scope: One retailer and a mixed training package that included sales and product content. The full gain cannot be attributed to soft skills alone.

    For your next decision

    How does this manager help the team turn knowledge into customer results?

    Proprietary observational meta-analysis · Gallup

    Engagement is linked to business results.

    Top-quartile engagement units had median differences of 23% higher profitability and 18% higher sales productivity versus bottom-quartile units. Turnover was also lower.

    Gallup · The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes: Q12 Meta-Analysis, 11th Edition · 2024 ↗

    736 studies across 347 organisations and 183,806 work units.

    Study scope: Work-unit associations, not proof that soft skills alone caused the differences or a forecast of results from Élan.

    For your next decision

    Will people feel able and willing to do their best work around this leader?

    Meta-analysis · Personnel Psychology

    Speaking up is part of performing well.

    Psychological safety was positively associated with task performance, learning, information-sharing and engagement.

    Frazier et al. · Psychological Safety: A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension · 2017 ↗

    136 independent samples, more than 22,000 individuals and nearly 5,000 groups.

    Study scope: Mostly correlational evidence; psychological safety is a shared working condition, not a fixed personality score or a guarantee of performance.

    For your next decision

    Can people admit a mistake, ask for help and challenge an idea around them?

    Longitudinal meta-analysis · Journal of Business Ethics

    The damage can show up in silence.

    Destructive leadership was associated with later silence, lower satisfaction and commitment, and stronger intentions to leave.

    Li et al. · Are Bad Leaders Indeed Bad for Employees? A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies Between Destructive Leadership and Employee Outcomes · 2024 ↗

    104 longitudinal studies and 30,314 participants; first published online in 2023.

    Study scope: Direction of causality remains complex: reciprocal analyses controlling prior behaviour did not establish a significant leader-to-negative-behaviour effect.

    For your next decision

    What happens after someone disagrees with them or brings bad news?

    Executive survey and interviews · Journal of Financial Economics

    Leaders value culture. Attention does not always follow.

    92% believed improving culture would increase company value. Among the 1,130 answering the leadership-time question, 69% said leaders needed to invest more time in culture.

    Graham, Grennan, Harvey & Rajgopal · Corporate culture: Evidence from the field · 2022 ↗

    Survey of 1,348 North American executives.

    Study scope: Executives’ reported beliefs, not a measured financial return or a comparison of spending priorities.

    For your next decision

    Will this hire strengthen the behaviour your company values—or undermine it?

    Longitudinal observational study · Industrial and Corporate Change

    How a company manages people matters as it grows.

    Changes in how firms selected, motivated and managed people were associated with higher failure risk. Replacing a founder with an outside CEO alone did not show the same pattern.

    Hannan, Baron, Hsu & Koçak · Organizational identities and the hazard of change · 2006 ↗

    Young Silicon Valley technology firms; failure analysis covered 154 firms and 28 failures, followed to June 2001.

    Study scope: Historical organisational-change evidence, not a test of candidate soft skills. It does not establish that one hire causes business failure or that culture should never change.

    For your next decision

    Can the company grow while keeping trust, expectations and responsibilities clear?

    Alternative source · Hannan, Baron, Hsu & Koçak ↗

    Observational study · Journal of Labor Economics

    Who leads them changes the work.

    In one large service business, the estimated difference between top- and bottom-decile supervisors exceeded the output of an additional worker on a nine-person team.

    Lazear, Shaw & Stanton · The Value of Bosses · 2015 ↗

    One technology-enabled service business; 23,878 workers and 1,940 supervisors.

    Study scope: An estimated effect in one setting, not a universal multiplier or a test of manager-first assessment.

    Alternative source · Lazear, Shaw & Stanton ↗

    Working paper · HBS 16-057

    The cost can spread to colleagues.

    A study of 58,542 workers found that misconduct-related costs could outweigh the productivity gain from a star performer.

    Housman & Minor · Toxic Workers · 2015 ↗

    58,542 workers across 11 firms, largely service/BPO settings. Misconduct means termination for egregious policy violations. The cost model included additional colleague turnover.

    Study scope: A working paper and context-specific comparison. This does not classify difficult, unfamiliar or disagreeing people as harmful or establish that Élan can predict misconduct.

    Event study · Journal of Financial Economics

    Judgement can become reputation.

    Public executive indiscretions were associated with weaker operating performance. Events involving CEOs were also associated with fewer new major customers and joint-venture partnerships.

    Cline, Walkling & Yore · The consequences of managerial indiscretions: Sex, lies, and firm value · 2018 ↗

    Public executive allegations and indiscretions; 219 distinct events plus 106 related observations.

    Study scope: Public events and associations, not the average cost of a bad hire or justification for private-life profiling. Personality assessment is not shown to predict these events.

    Alternative source · Cline, Walkling & Yore ↗

    Empirical study · Journal of Finance

    Conduct can spread through working relationships.

    A study of financial advisers found that exposure to colleagues with misconduct histories increased the propensity for misconduct.

    Dimmock, Gerken & Graham · Is Fraud Contagious? Coworker Influence on Misconduct by Financial Advisors · 2018 ↗

    US financial advisers; brokerage mergers used to examine exposure to new colleagues.

    Study scope: A specialised financial-sector setting and identification strategy, not a numerical contagion rate for all teams or a personality-based forecast.

    Alternative source · Dimmock, Gerken & Graham ↗

    Randomised simulation · Pediatrics

    The way people interact matters.

    In a randomised simulation involving 24 medical teams, exposure to rudeness reduced diagnostic and procedural performance.

    Riskin et al. · The Impact of Rudeness on Medical Team Performance: A Randomized Trial · 2015 ↗

    24 neonatal intensive-care teams in a simulation, with blinded performance ratings.

    Study scope: Simulated medical tasks, not evidence of startup revenue losses or patient mortality, nor proof an assessment can identify a future harmful colleague.

    Alternative source · Riskin et al. ↗

    Investor survey · Journal of Financial Economics

    The people behind the thesis.

    In a survey covering 681 VC firms, 95% considered the management team important in investment selection; 47% named it the most important factor.

    Gompers, Gornall, Kaplan & Strebulaev · How do venture capitalists make decisions? · 2020 ↗

    885 institutional venture capitalists at 681 firms; firm-level aggregation.

    Study scope: Reported investor priorities, not measured causes of portfolio failure or evidence that 95% of investment outcomes depend on team quality.

    Alternative source · Gompers, Gornall, Kaplan & Strebulaev ↗

    Observational study · Journal of Management

    Disagreement is not the same as relationship conflict.

    In a study of 323 new ventures, relationship conflict was negatively associated with performance.

    de Jong, Song & Song · How Lead Founder Personality Affects New Venture Performance: The Mediating Role of Team Conflict · 2013 ↗

    323 new ventures; online publication 2011.

    Study scope: An association in a specific model and sample, not a universal failure percentage, a founder diagnosis or an argument for similar personalities.

    Alternative source · de Jong, Song & Song ↗

    Retrospective teaching case

    A hiring problem can become a runway problem.

    Eisenmann's Dot & Bo case connects repeated operations-leadership hiring problems with operational disorder and cash consumption, alongside financing conditions.

    Thomas Eisenmann · Why Startups Fail, case-based course materials · 2021 ↗

    Dot & Bo case; multiple interacting operational and financing causes. Not a representative statistical estimate.

    Study scope: The case contains interacting operational and financing causes; it does not establish losses attributable to one appointment or prevention through assessment.

    Meta-analytic reassessment · Journal of Applied Psychology

    Better interviews need structure

    Structured interviews ranked highest among the selection procedures studied. Earlier estimates were often overstated.

    Sackett et al. · Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range · 2022 ↗

    Reassessment of validity estimates across personnel-selection procedures.

    Study scope: Supports structured job-related inquiry, not validation of Élan.

    Meta-analysis · Personnel Psychology

    Compatibility has more than one layer

    Person–job, person–organisation, person–group and person–supervisor fit were examined as distinct layers associated with work outcomes.

    Kristof-Brown, Zimmerman & Johnson · Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit · 2005 ↗

    172 studies and 836 effect sizes across distinct kinds of fit and work outcomes.

    Study scope: Association and context, not a formula proving a particular candidate will succeed.

    Meta-analytic review · Personnel Psychology

    Looking like a leader is different from leading well

    Narcissism was positively associated with leadership emergence, with no overall linear relationship with effectiveness. Self versus other ratings differed.

    Grijalva et al. · Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships · 2015 ↗

    Leadership emergence and effectiveness; self-ratings and other-ratings examined.

    Study scope: Not all confidence or ambition is narcissism. These findings are not a clinical diagnosis.